All posts by Marianne Kidd

Couple WIN Wind Turbine Ruling

This is a true Victory, as a court has upheld property rights violations! Next stop, Ontario

October 2, 2013  – The Connexion – France

A WINDFARM has been ordered to demolish ten turbines and pay compensation and fines after it was successfully sued by a couple.

Speaking to Le Figaro newspaper, the couple’s lawyer, Philippe Bodereau, said: “This decision is very important because it demonstrates to all those who put up with windfarms with a feeling of powerlessness that the battle is not in vain, even against big groups, or authorities who deliver building permits, that legal options are available to everyone, that we have a right to live in peace and that people can do other things than suffer.”

The couple bought their 18th century listed property, the Château de Flers, in 1993.

A tribunal in Montpellier ruled that the couple had suffered due to the “degradation of the environment, resulting from a rupture of a bucolic landscape and countryside”. It also agreed the couple had suffered from the noise of the turbines and from the flashing lights.

“The situation, instantly out of place, permanent and quickly unbearable, created a problem that went beyond the typical inconveniences of neighbours and constituted a violation of property rights,” ruled the judgement.

The value of the property had no bearing on the ruling.

The wind farm owners, Compagnie du Vent, have been given four months to take down the turbines, which were erected in 2007 on two sites next to the property in Nord-Pas-de-Calais. It has appealed the decision.

“Our projects are in the general interest, following the Grenelle de l’environnement and not in the interest of individuals,” said the president of Compagnie du Vent, Thierry Conil. “However, it’s right that democracy should allow people to take action.”

The two sites are a €20m investment and produce enough electricity for 22,000 people according to the company.

In 2010 it was ordered to demolish four turbines near Narbonne after it was taken to court by four farmers who were granted €430,000 in compensation. However after appealing it reached an out of court settlement.

Le Figaro said that lawyers associated with these cases said that they were often resolved amicably out of court. “I don’t know an example in France where a demolition was ordered and followed through,” one lawyer told the paper.

– See more at: //www.connexionfrance.com/wind-farm-turbines-demolition-noise-nuisanc

Defining the rules for maintenance of wind turbines

 By Mike Bridgen » – The Northern Echo – October 1, 2013 – UK

NATIONAL minimum standards for the installation and maintenance of medium wind turbines are being drawn up for the first time.

SETTING STANDARDS: Julian Martin, of Ice Renewables, is chairman of the body setting minimum installation and maintenance standards for medium wind turbines

Julian Martin, chief executive of Northallerton-based Ice Renewables, is chairing the body setting the standards.

At present, there are no defined rules or medium wind standards for installers or maintainance companies to work to and, consequently, the quality of services varies across the UK.

There have been nightmare stories of customers being left with turbines not working, no proper operations and maintenance contracts, a lack of turbine parts, installers who have walked away and manufacturers not set up to deal with the maintenance of their fleets of turbines.

RenewableUK, the trade body, has recognised this and is working with its small and medium wind strategy group, chaired by Mr Martin, to introduce a national MCS approved medium wind standard by 2014.

It wants an international IEC medium wind standard later next year for turbine design, site assessment, installation and operations and maintenance across the whole medium wind sector.

Ice Renewables is an established specialist in the small and medium wind sector, and is focused on setting and maintaining the highest standards.

It has launched its own unrivalled Complete Wind Solutions package, extending a specialist operations and maintenance (O&M) service to manufacturers, developers and customers in the medium and Megawatt wind sector.

The company was established in 2006 and has become a sector leader but, in its early years, it had firsthand experience with the issues of subcontracting to an external (O&M) firm.

“We were not happy with the level of service we received for our customers and soon realised the turbines were not being well looked after and our customers were unhappy,” said Mr Martin.

“Because of this, we took the decision to bring the service in-house. We haven’t looked back and currently operate and maintain 12 Vergnet medium wind turbines, with our last quarter availability rate being an average of 99.6 per cent.” With a fleet that extends from Edinburgh to Cornwall and from Suffolk to Newark, Ice has a proven record for the delivery of these specialised services, Mr Martin said: “Our customers want good communication, fast response time to minimise their turbines down time, well-trained engineers, a good relationship with the manufacturer, and a set of complementary added value services, such as high voltage maintenance work and blade repair, so that they do not have gaps in the service of their turbine.”

He said a good O&M strategy was increasingly a priority for manufacturers, developers and customers, as it can extend the turbine’s lifetime, reduce costs and increase availability.

Mr Martin advised potential wind turbine owners to think carefully about who they choose to construct their turbine and ensure they work with reputable companies with a local presence who are dedicated to the long-term support of their wind project.

Original Article Here: http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/archive/2013/10/01/10709580.Defining_the_rules_for_maintenance_of_wind_turbines/

Windfarm subsidies will be axed, says Cameron

By Robert Merrick, September 29, 2013 – The Northern Echo – UK

Blindfold Green Energy PicSUBSIDIES for wind farms will be axed, David Cameron said – potentially scaling back development in County Durham, a wind power ‘hotspot’.

In an eve-of-conference interview, the prime minister revealed he did not want to keep the subsidies for “a second longer than they’re necessary”.

The move appeared to be in response to Ed Miliband’s eye-catching pledge to freeze energy bills for 20 months, from 2015, to tackle a “cost of living crisis”.

Critics claim the so-called ‘renewables obligation’ – which subsidises wind farms – piles £23 on each household bill.

But scrapping subsidies would be bitterly criticised by environmental campaigners, who argue the expansion of wind farms is crucial to cutting carbon emissions.

That includes in County Durham, which – on one calculation – has the second highest concentration of wind turbines in England, after Cornwall.

More than 20 farms have been built, or have permission, with another 13 in planning – and a controversial 24-turbine development earmarked for The Isles near Newton Aycliffe.

Speaking to the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Cameron said: “Recently, I opened the London Array, the biggest offshore wind farm anywhere in the world, and it’s good that Britain is leading the way in this technology.

E.ON recently agreed to reduce the output of The Isles wind farm from 63.5 megawatts (mw) to 48mw, which means it will be decided by local planners, rather than the Government.

Original Article Here: http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10705835.Windfarm_subsidies_will_be_axed__says_Cameron/

Where are all the Rural Communities?

As cities grow bigger, rural communities are getting smaller…does this sound familiar?

Canada’s small towns under siege

As populations in urban centres grow, what happens to our rural communities?

By  | Yahoo Canada News

As the mayor of Cape Breton Regional Municipality stood at the airport, waiting for a flight to Halifax where he would try to sell a plan to renew his area, he witnessed just how badly his constituents needed the change he was seeking.

Mayor Cecil Clarke said he saw children and spouses crying as their loved ones, 120 residents of this struggling area, boarded a cross-country flight that would take them to work in Alberta.

“It’s affecting the families, and in some cases it’s breaking the family units apart,” he says. “That’s not a good thing.”

And not everyone is commuting – they’re leaving. Economic decline has siphoned more than 15 per cent of this municipality’s population in the last 15 years. Cape Breton Regional Municipality is considered a metropolitan area, made up of many smaller towns with Sydney as its urban hub. But even after its amalgamation in 1995, the area has failed to recover from the closure of the coal mines, steel plants and cod fisheries that once made these communities thrive.

Aging infrastructure and a looming unemployment rate of 18.6 per cent are only two of its many challenges.

“It’s a huge concern,” Clarke says.

Clarke: “A Band-Aid doesn’t hold. What we need is a real solution and that’s what we’re doing.”

Others, too, have expressed concern about paralyzed local economies in non-metropolitan areas losing industry, services,land value and people – a series of pangs that, by some accounts, could hurt the well-being of the people who live in these communities and unravel the threads that tie small-town Canada together.

Rural depopulation isn’t new. Urbanization and the decline of natural resource-based industries like mining have led North Americans, particularly young people, to migrate out of their hometowns in search of better opportunities and different lifestyles, with the effect of a handful of metropolitan areas in Canada growing while many other, smaller areas decline.

Fazley Siddiq, a professor at Dalhousie University, is working on a book about his research on population shifts over the past 50 years in Canada and the United States, conducted during his year as a Fulbright chair at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Siddiq says that while Canada’s population has grown nationally, there are disparities between provinces, regions and towns. He sees a hollowing out in many of Canada’s small communities and he’s worried it could have devastating consequences.

For example, Siddiq found that between 1986 and 2010, the population of the town of Stikine, B.C. had a negative growth rate of 45 per cent while the growth rate in York, Ont., north of Toronto, was 186 per cent.

Cape Breton’s population declined at a rate of 17.11 per cent over that period.

“The clear trend we’re seeing is the larger cities – the metropolitan areas are growing, the non-metropolitan areas are not growing, and especially in Atlantic Canada – they are declining.”

In 1961, slightly more than half of Canada’s population lived outside of major metropolitan areas. By 2011, over 70 percent of us live in cities. In addition, more than 60 per cent of immigrants between 2008 and 2012 chose to live in Canada’s biggest urban centres: Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver.

Siddiq says policy-makers may soon face tough decisions about whether to prop up struggling towns with investment or use that money in big cities where more Canadians live.

“It’s a festering wound,” he says.

We need to, first of all, understand this is a very serious problem. That unless we address it, it will lead to a very serious collapse of real estate prices, collapse of local businesses.
— Dalhousie professor Fazley Siddiq

The issue has experts, politicians and community leaders divided. Some, such as economist Rose Olfert, suggest it’s best to let economic forces work untouched, even if it means losing some communities.

 

Olfert, a professor at the University of Saskatchewan, says we shouldn’t spend finite public funds to sustain towns that aren’t viable; towns might find solutions on their own, and if Canadians want to move to cities, they will go.

“I don’t know why we want to intervene in this process,” she says.

Olfert says the forces that draw Canadians out of small towns – including job prospects, nightlife and the variety of attractions cities offer – are powerful and they’re not easily slowed down, though they can create hardship.

“This lament for rural areas, it’s very real and genuine and emotional sometimes,” she says. “Because in that transition there are individuals that are caught.”

Siddiq’s concern is for those individuals, but it’s also one of time; as people choose cities like Toronto over smaller Canadian municipalities, they leave fewer residents to pay taxes and to support local business.  And Siddiq says life could become much more difficult for those who stay unless change comes soon.

“We need to, first of all, understand this is a very serious problem. That unless we address it, it will lead to a very serious collapse of real estate prices, collapse of local businesses,” he says.

“It has the potential to ruin the lives of hard working people, for no apparent fault on their part.”

Although the trend has been ongoing for decades, Siddiq says he worries we are approaching a point when the damage will be more severe and the death knell will toll more swiftly for towns that fail to reinvent themselves for a modern, service-oriented economy.

He likens the effect to a tight family budget.

“If your family budget is being reduced by 2 per cent over the year, the first few years you manage but then there comes a point where you’re no longer able to pay rent, you’re no longer able to buy food. And then of course the family is no longer viable,” he says.

Olfert: ‘Tell me what it is we’re buying. What do we get in return?’

Though many rural and small town communities’ family budgets, so to speak, are shrinking each year, sociologist Bill Reimer at Concordia University says these areas built our country on their agriculture and their natural resources, and they contribute to Canada’s national prosperity in ways we tend to overlook.

“It’s easy to forget that our smartphones, cars, and urban lifestyles are largely paid for by our international trade in rural-based goods: grains, fish, timber, and energy,” Reimer wrote in an email exchange.

“If our rural communities and the lifestyles of people living in them are left to deteriorate we will all suffer in the long run.”

Siddiq says policymakers must act now to prevent long-term damage to the economy and the vulnerable individuals living in dwindling areas.

“We owe it to each other to do our best, to protect each other and to ensure that if certain communities are no longer viable that we do something about it,” Siddiq says.

He says proactive local leadership, government support or in some cases amalgamation could be part of strategies to slow the decline. But for towns without hope of recovering, there’s the option of encouraging everyone to simply clear out.

“Do we just abandon territory? I mean is that possible? Yes, I’m not ruling it out. I don’t know. That’s why we need to have the discussion,” Siddiq says.

 

“If we must relocate communities, we need to start the process now. Because thinking the problem will go away, that’s the worst thing,” he adds.

Newfoundland and Labrador has a community relocation program through which residents can receive up to a $270,000 payout for leaving if their towns ask the provincial government for resettlement help.

 

However, Olfert says subsidizing residents to leave dying communities seems “excessive,” even if it limits the damage to people and local economies.

“I don’t know if we want to ease that transition. There will be unpleasant things,” she says.

It’s easy to forget that our smartphones, cars, and urban lifestyles are largely paid for by our international trade in rural-based goods: grains, fish, timber, and energy.
— Sociologist Bill Reimer

Olfert says she’s sympathetic to those who are caught in a population shift, but stepping in might only drag out the pain for towns that will die anyway and the merit of a government investment remains unclear.

 

“Tell me what it is we’re buying. What do we get in return? It might be justified but what are the benefits?”

Cecil Clarke says that in Cape Breton, provincial and federal investments are buying opportunities in an area of enormous economic value to the country.

He cited the potential European trade agreement with Canada that could improve shipping opportunities for the Port of Sydney and its fisheries.

“When you look at that lens, you’d say this is a very strategic area worthy of the investment,” he says.

Based on that view, Cape Breton has proposed a $300 million, five-year capital plan, asking for support from the provincial and federal governments to revitalize the area with a strategy focused on attracting new business.

The plan includes repairs to crumbling infrastructure such as century-old sewer lines, new buildings for transit, upgraded police and firefighting buildings and a new Farmer’s Market. The plan also proposes expanding the size of Sydney’s port to bring in more coveted tourist dollars.

Cape Breton estimates its capital plan, which has the province’s support, would create about 500 jobs, and perhaps it could start to re-assemble the pieces that made this area important in years past.

“In both world wars, this port and the people here were fundamental to global peace and achieving that,” Clarke says. “Our geography hasn’t changed, economics have, and we have to get that in sync.”

That could mean converting former mining towns into bedroom communities, tearing down derelict houses and ensuring every dollar spent will be worth each penny.

“A Band-Aid doesn’t hold. What we need is a real solution and that’s what we’re doing,” Clarke says.

As for those leaving Cape Breton for work, Clarke says many of these reluctant migrants haven’t found a better home elsewhere.

“People don’t want to leave,” he says. “We have thousands of people that are making a trans-Canada commute just because of the attachment they have to their homes.”

Clarke said even his younger brother has moved to Alberta for work, but he wants to come home.

“That, no academic model can take into account — the attachment of how you’re associated with the place you’re from.”

Original Article Here: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/canada-s-small-towns-under-seige-162512916.html

Dear Concerned Citizens…please comment on this registry!!!

Dear Concerned Citizens,

The Environmental Registry for Ontario (ERB) has posted the following proposal for public comments until Oct. 5, 2013. According to the  ERB Registry # 011-9860 this proposal is for a new Environmental Compliance Approval (Air and Noise) for a wind turbine rotor blades facility located in Welland, Ontario.

The facility will have eighteen (18) exhaust fans and two (2) dust extraction systems serving the processing area, as well heating and stand-by power systems. Emissions to the atmosphere will include ammonia, petroleum distillates, ethylbenzene and suspended particulate matter.

Powerblades Industries Inc is applying to have a release of  toxins allowed in the approval so there will be no legal way to shut them down for this unless it can be proven that they are over the limit stated in the approval and they are unsuccessful at mitigating this over the limit amount within about 2 years.

 

Comments can be made on line at

 

http://www.ebr.gov.on.ca/ERS-WEB-External/displaynoticecontent.do?noticeId=MTIwMzYy&statusId=MTgwMTQz&language=en

 

For those of you that would like additional information the following fact sheets have been made available:

Ethylbenzene MSDS      http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9923958

Ammonia Solution  http://wwwsci.seastarchemicals.com/safety/07AmmoniaMSDSRev201109.pdf

Petroleum Distillates  http://www.online.petro-canada.ca/datasheets/en_CA/w276.pdf

Carbon Nanotubes and ASBESTOS – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2706793

 

My particular concern is what is in the Suspended Particulate Matter?  Since the blades are made from a carbon fibre – a non-recyclable material – is one of the particulate fibres Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs)‏?

 

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), are valuable industrial products with multiple applications in the field of nanotechnologies. Yet legitimate concerns about their potential adverse effects on human health need to be addressed because theypresent similarities to asbestos fibres in terms of their shape and size. It is legitimate to raise the question of their safety for human health. CNTs are elongated and ultrafine, and the fact is that human beings may be exposed to CNTs through inhalation. While not yet definitive, data are now available providing information on the pulmonary and cellular effects of CNTs, which may be compared to those of asbestos fibres.

We do not need another asbestos like fiasco because we jumped into something without due diligence. Ignorance will not protect anyone. Plausible deniability as in “I didn’t know” will not protect us from the scientific effects of ammonia, petroleum distillates, ethylbenzene, and suspended particulate matter.

 

A Senior Official with the MOE has confirmed that as of Dec 2012 there were no medical experts on their staff. Dr. Arlene King, the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario, does not want any involvement with the effects of IWT’s on human health. According to the MOE health complaints are to be given to the local Medical Officer of Health. The local Medical Officer of Health for the Niagara Region is Dr. Valerie Jaeger.

 

Please send letters of concern to the EBR using the internet or post to

Application Assessment Officer
Ministry of the Environment
Operations Division
Environmental Approvals Access and Service Integration Branch
Application Verification Unit
2 St. Clair Avenue West
Floor 12A
Toronto Ontario
M4V 1L5
Phone: (416) 314-8001
Fax: (416) 314-8452
Toll Free Phone: (800) 461-6290,

 

Letters should also be sent to Welland Mayor and council members and the Regional Medical Officer of Health – Dr. Valerie Jaeger.

Email addresses of Welland Mayor and council members and Regional Medical Officer  Dr Valerie Jaeger:

https://blu171.mail.live.com/mail/clear.gif

mayor@welland.camark.carl@welland.camaryann.grimaldi@welland.ca,frank.campion@welland.cadavid.mcleod@welland.camichael.belcastro@welland.ca, 2,pat.chiocchio@welland.catony.dimarco@welland.carocky.letourneau@welland.ca,michael.petrachenko@welland.cajim.larouche@welland.cabob.wright@welland.ca, Dr. Valerie Jaeger valerie.jaeger@niagararegion.ca

 

Government ministers, ministries, agencies and municipalities have an ethical duty and legal obligation to protect the health, safety, quality of life and well being of citizens and their properties. Please just do your job so I can get back to enjoying mine.

Belwood Legal Strategy Meeting – Open Invitation – October 8, 2013

Join us on Tuesday, October 8th for an important meeting about legal strategy, being hosted in Belwood.

 

Over the past several years many rural communities have been investigating their legal options in the fight against wind industrialization. Recently there has been a development that could be beneficial to all communities led by Barrister Julian Falconer.  The case is based on the merits of a Charter Challenge of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”  The Appeal states the right to security of a person and principles of fundamental justice have been violated.

 

Julian will be joining us in Belwood by teleconference to provide details on the case and the progress made to date. 

 

This is an opportunity to get first hand information on the status of the case as well as to discuss how we can work together to raise the necessary funds to support it.  The Belwood group is organizing this meeting because they believe the claim is a viable legal option.  After the presentation, their community will vote to determine financial support.  Other communities at risk from wind turbines are welcome to participate as the legal action has the potential to benefit all of us in rural Ontario.

 

Place:       Pine Meadows Retirement Community (Grand Hall)

Address:  8473 Wellington County Road 19 (between Fergus and Belwood on the north side of Lake Belwood)

Time:       7:00pm

Date:        Tuesday October 8th

 

If you plan on attending please contact Janet Vallery at jvallery@everus.ca

 

 

About Julian Falconer – Julian specializes in civil, constitutional and criminal litigation with a particular focus on state accountability.  He has successfully represented clients in many high profile cases including the Sammy Yatim family, Aron Firman, and the Ashley Smith Inquest. He was co-counsel on the Maher Arrar Case post 9/11.  According to Canadian Lawyer magazine Falconer, “Deserves a spot high on any list of the country’s top advocates.”    His alma mater, University of Toronto, has named him one of the 20th century’s 100 most notable graduates.

 

A Cowboy Named Bud – Everyone needs a Laugh

A cowboy named Bud was overseeing his herd in a remote pasture in Ontario when suddenly a brand-new BMW advanced toward him out of a cloud of dust. 
The driver, a young man in a Brioni suit, Gucci shoes, RayBan sunglasses and YSL tie, leaned out the window and asked the cowboy, “If I tell you exactly how many cows and calves you have in your herd, Will you give me a calf?”  

Bud  looks at the man, obviously a yuppie, then looks at his peacefully grazing herd and calmly answers, “Sure, Why not?” 

The yuppie parks his car, whips out his macBook Air computer, connects it to his iphone, and surfs to a NASApage on the Internet, where he calls up a GPS satellite to get an exact fix on his location which he then feeds to another NASA satellite that scans the area in an ultra-high-resolution photo.

The young man then opens the digital photo in iPhoto and exports it to an image processing facility in Hamburg , Germany .

Within seconds, he receives an email on his iPhone that the image has been processed and the data stored. He then accesses an MS-SQL database through an ODBC connected Excel spreadsheet with email on his iPhone and, after a few minutes, receives a response. 

Finally, he prints out a full-color, 150-page report on his hi-tech, miniaturized Canon LaserJet printer, turns to the cowboy and says, “You have exactly 1,586 cows and calves.”         

 “That’s right. Well, I guess you can take one of my calves,” says Bud. 

He watches the young man select one of the animals and looks on with amusement as the young man stuffs it into the trunk of his car.

Then Bud says to the young man, “Hey, if I can tell you exactly what your business is, will you give me back my calf?”        

The young man thinks about it for a second and then says, “Okay, why not?” 

“You’re a Member of Ontario’s Provincial Parliament “, says Bud. 

“Wow! That’s correct,” says the yuppie, “but how did you guess that?” 

 “No guessing required.” answered the cowboy. “You showed up here even though nobody called you; you want to get paid for an answer I already knew, to a question I never asked. You used millions of dollars worth of equipment trying to show me how much smarter than me you are; and you don’t know a thing about how working people make a living – or about cows, for that matter.  This is a herd of sheep. … 
Now give me back my dog.

 

Changing the Public Perception: Industrial Wind Energy Has VERY High Costs with VERY low Benefits

Blindfold Green Energy PicAn article which digs deeper into the question about what the “Grassroots” issues are and potentially “What we NEED” to be addressing in the debate about Siting of a Turbine vs Fundamental Benefits for all

Excerpts  from the Article ring true for the Mothers Against Wind Turbines…Although the distance of people from  the turbines is a significant issue for those currently suffering…the FACTS remain that:

Industrial  Wind Turbines:

—   They will not solve our energy issues (e.g. they most certainly do not reduce our dependence on imported oil).

— They are not, and never can be, a viable substitute for conventional energy sources (e.g. because they are not reliable, have no Capacity Value, are much more expensive, etc.).

— They will not solve our environmental problems (e.g. contrary to popular perception, they do not reduce greenhouse gas emissions in any meaningful way, due to their inherent limitations as an energy source).

Should we pursue the path to change the public perception of wind energy and call into question the fundamental viability of it? I say yes.

Read original article here: http://www.masterresource.org/2010/06/eric-bibler-to-the-grassroots/