March wind/electricity events in Haldimand/Norfolk

Upcoming Happenings

Monday, March 2: Next Era’s Open House re their Bat Study in their Summerhaven wind project area in Haldimand. Open House is from 5 – 8 pm at Fisherville Lions Community Centre, 18 Main St. West, Fisherville.

Tuesday, March 3: The folks who appealed the Port Ryerse wind project should find out today through a conference call about the info that MNR gathered about the presence of Barn Owls in Port Ryerse area. The ERT appeal hearing was delayed 5 months to allow MNR to assess if the owls were living there or just passing through. The ERT panel judges will also likely discuss whether the ERT hearing will begin on March 31 as planned or another date acceptable to all parties.

Wednesday, March 4: Lake Erie Connector 3rd Open House re the two 500 MW electricity cables being planned under the lakebed from Nanticoke to Erie County, Pennsylvania. Open House location is Nanticoke Hall, 38 Rainham Rd., Nanticoke from 3:00 – 7:00 pm. The cables will take electricity both directions so we’ll even be importing some “dirty” electricity from the heavy coal-burning states in the future.

See attached notice above.  (Lake Erie connector open house 3)

Rural action plan calls for windfarm compensation for homeowners

Homeowners who think the price of their house would be hit by a nearby windfarm development should be able to claim compensation, the Scottish Conservatives have said.

The party will launch a comprehensive rural action plan on Monday at a major rural showcase in Stirling.

The strategy will cover a range of issues confronting rural Scotland, and was devised after the Scottish Government made clear its only focus was on land reform.

As part of the proposals, the Scottish Conservatives have called for a valuation system to be set up allowing people to recover the lost market value on homes affected by new windfarms.

Many communities across the country have complained that large turbines looming over their towns and villages have made the area less appealing to live, therefore reducing the price of their properties.

The party is asking the Scottish Government to look at a similar model in Denmark, where a valuation authority can decide if a person’s home has been impacted, and how much the windfarm developers should pay in compensation.

The SNP’s extreme pro-windfarm approach has sparked a rise in windfarms being built across rural Scotland, despite concerns among residents and local councils.

Scotland, despite having less than 10 per cent of the UK’s population, now hosts more than half of the UK’s windfarms.

Thousands of objections are submitted by the public every year, while local authorities receive scores of applications for developments each month.

read more: http://www.scottishconservatives.com/2015/02/rural-action-plan-calls-windfarm-compensation-homeowners/

Council will be asked to contribute to the Charter Challenge

Agenda for Tuesday’s Council meeting is below.  Council will be asked to contribute to the Charter Challenge as a number of other municipalities have.

Let’s try to get the seats filled.  Thanks.

Click to access 02-17-15%20Council%20%28including%20Admin%20%26%20PW%29%20Agenda.pdf

Experts offers insight to wind farm questions

Capture

 

An expert witness called by The United Citizens of Livingston County testified the majority of Tuesday evening during the ongoing Livingston County Zoning Board of Appeals hearing at the Walton Centre.

Michael McCann, of McCann Appraisal, LLC, a Chicago-based company, testified about property values and how they are negatively affected when wind turbines are installed.

He said he has 33 years experience in appraising many types of commercial real estate, land and special use properties. He also has extensive litigation experience, qualified as an expert witness in over 20 states, and has testified at federal and state trials, zoning hearings, utility siting boards and arbitration. He has also done work for other wind farm projects throughout the United States.

McCann presented a slide show with many maps and figures. He also illustrated reasons for people to sell property with a turbine on or near it include health impacts.

He said it’s a “conspiracy theory” among neighbors when it comes to those health impacts, but he affirmed those events do occur.

He also listed issues he called “more physical in nature.” These included trespass or intrusion, excessive noise, vibrations, odor, contaminants and flicker.

READ MORE:  Pontiac Daily Leader, By Cynthia Grau Posted Feb. 11, 2015

Plympton-Wyoming stands behind new bylaw aimed at wind turbines

view by-law here: 2014-62 plymptom-wyoming by law

Suncor Energy and the Town of Plympton-Wyoming are at odds again over a wind turbine bylaw.

1297381360911_ORIGINALJody Hood, a manager of development and engineering with Suncor Energy, raised concerns at a recent town council meeting over a bylaw passed in 2014 to regulate wind turbine noise.

Some 27 of the 46 wind turbines Suncor plans to build as part of its Cedar Point wind project would be located in Plympton-Wyoming.

“The noise limits related to our wind operations are regulated by the province,” said Suncor spokesperson Jason Vaillant.

“We certainly intend to operate within those limits.”

Vaillant said “from a technical perspective” the bylaw would prevent wind turbines from operating in the municipality.

Continue reading Plympton-Wyoming stands behind new bylaw aimed at wind turbines

Gagging the Waubra Foundation

WCFN's avatarWorld Council for Nature


wcfn-xxl

World Council for Nature

OPEN LETTER TO:

Commissioner Susan Pascoe
Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC)


Commissioner,

We are critical of the ongoing massacre of birds and bats perpetrated by wind farms around the world. We are not impervious, however, to the negative effects these machines are having on humans.

Recently, we issued a press release about a new study which vindicates the work of the Waubra Foundation (1). Indeed, over the last few years, that world-renown Charity focused their efforts on the connection between infrasound and low frequency noise (ILFN) emitted by wind turbines and the harmful sensations felt by nearby residents. Tirelessly, they insisted that this health risk should be objectively and scientifically investigated by ethical acoustic researchers. The Steven Cooper study (1) proved their concerns were justified, and recommended more complete studies to confirm its own findings.

We were therefore surprised to learn that, last December, ACNC Assistant Commissioner…

View original post 380 more words

Kevin Dooley’s Research on Infrasound

MAWT (Mothers Against Wind Turbines  Inc.)  was very grateful that researcher Kevin Dooley and his associate took the time to present their research at the Environmental Review Tribunal as presenters in the recent appeal hearing against the approval for the Niagara Regional Wind Corporation project.  The following links are provided courtesy of Mr. Dooley permission is granted for their use with proper citation.  The two papers are copyrighted  by ASA but can be downloaded at the links provided.

CaptureMore information and up to date research relative to infrasound is available at:  www.kevindooleyinc.com

Video Presentation:

Infrasound and Motion Sickness

Kevin A Dooley

http://vimeo.com/103602357

Significant infrasound levels a previously unrecognized contaminant in landmark motion sickness studies

Kevin A Dooley

http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/poma/20/1/10.1121/1.4868716

Acoustic interaction as a primary cause of infrasonic spinning mode generation and propagation from wind turbines.

Kevin A Dooley and Andy Metelka

http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/poma/20/1/10.1121/1.4863410

A GREAT DIAGRAM TO HELP PEOPLE UNDERSTAND HOW A TURBINE CAN IMPACT ITS NEIGHBOURS

This is a useful tool to use to show people how much one turbine can impact the property values of homes around it.   Now imagine if any of Farmers B through E have a second neighbour with a turbine.  They are completely prevented from ever doing anything on their own property again.  But turbines don’t affect property values…..right.

Thanks to Concerned Citizens of Delta County for this photo.  Origin unknown.

10155650_1546437988970242_8706028000469054610_n

One Lawsuit Settled, But No Truce in Wind Energy Debate

A lawsuit in which residents living near the Lake Winds wind plant south of Ludington claimed the facility was making people sick has been settled out of court. Cary Shineldecker, one of the plaintiffs in the case, isn’t allowed to discuss details of the settlement, but is still allowed to talk about the alleged negative health effects that can be suffered by those who live near such facilities.

“What I think is different about this settlement is that, although the details of the settlement are confidential, I’m not gagged from speaking out about the problems with wind energy,” Shineldecker said. “I think everything we’ve done here has helped the community and residents. For too long, supporters of wind energy have been able to silence and discredit those who have to live with the effects of it.

“We saw how they silenced Jerry Punch and his group,” Shineldecker continued. “When his group was working on a study that refuted what wind energy supporters wanted to be reported about the health impacts of wind turbines, they (the wind energy supporters) shut them up.”

downloadOn April 1, 2013, a group of 17 residents who lived near the Lake Winds wind plant – others joined the group later – filed a lawsuit against Consumers Energy in Mason County Circuit Court. The lawsuit alleged that people were experiencing dizziness, sleeplessness, headaches and other physical symptoms primarily due to noise generated by the wind plant’s 56 giant wind turbines, which the plaintiffs claimed had been erected too close to homes.

Continue reading One Lawsuit Settled, But No Truce in Wind Energy Debate

Mandy Smith “… I am alarmed about the close proximity of proposed turbine T83 to my property. “

read Mandy Smith Presentation here

I, and my neighbours, expect that Stantec/ NRWC is just as concerned about the future of our township as we are; consequently it is hard to believe that they would neglect to do proper due diligence in the application process for the approval of the NRWC project.  I, as a presenter, am expected to prove that the project will not cause serious harm, and this can only be done with the proper completion and documentation of all studies and field visits.  The final results of these visits and studies must demonstrate the cooperation of the residents who will be affected by the siting of the IWT’s.  Then and only then can I and my community be satisfied that this project will NOT cause “serious harm”.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Protecting our children from Industrial Wind Power Emissions is our first priority!