Offshore wind energy faces setbacks in Great Lakes

Julie Grant   Cleveland Ohio  July 04, 2014

The U.S. doesn’t yet generate one watt of energy from commercial offshore wind.

A few years ago, it looked like the Great Lakes might lead the nation. Pennsylvania was among a handful of states working with federal agencies to speed up the process.

As recently as this spring, construction of a wind farm in Lake Erie, off the Ohio shoreline near Cleveland, looked promising. But now, there’s doubt there will be any wind development in the Great Lakes.

The idea for building a wind farm in Lake Erie near Cleveland was hatched ten years ago. Wind energy developer Lorry Wagner says leaders started looking toward the energy sector to create more jobs. That’s when they realized the region’s potential for offshore wind energy.

“The real resource is in the Lake. And the reason for that is you get about three times the energy due to the higher wind speeds and less turbulence than you do on land.”

The Department of Energy estimates the country has an offshore wind capacity of 4 million megawatts. That’s four times the generating capacity of all U.S. electric power plants.

Wagner is president of the Lake Erie Energy Development Corporation, a non-profit known as LEED Co.

They started developing a pilot project, to build a wind farm out in the lake. Other Great Lakes states were also moving forward with offshore wind. In 2012, Pennsylvania, Michigan and others negotiated with federal agencies to streamline the permitting process. A proposed wind farm in Nantucket Sound called Cape Wind was mired in lawsuits, and it looked like the Great Lakes might be the nation’s first region to get a project in the water.

And LEED Co.’s wind farm was in line to be that project. LEED Co was in the running for a $47 million grant from the Department of Energy to get things started.

Standing on the Cleveland pier in late April, LEED Co spokesman Eric Ritter pointed out into the Lake, at where they plan to build six turbines. Each would be taller than the Statue of Liberty. Ritter was confident LEED Co. would win.

“We’re anticipating good news in couple of weeks.”

But they didn’t get good news. Last month, the Department of Energy granted the money to off-shore wind projects on the east and west coasts.  Read rest of article here.


2 thoughts on “Offshore wind energy faces setbacks in Great Lakes”

  1. Once all the onshore wind turbines are up and running in the next couple years I predict a big announcement for off shore wind turbines. In 2017 Bob Chiarelli will announce that the Darlington nuclear power plant will be mothballed. It was a sink hole for money from day one. It was to have cost 7 billion but ended up costing 14 billion. It’s up for rebuilding and that isn’t going to happen. They will make a deal to buy hydro from Quebec and plans will be set up an offshore wind farm in Lake Ontario south of Darlington and one in Lake Erie south of Nanticoke. They will be far enough out that people won’t see them.

  2. I have no doubt that you are correct on all points. But I have a saying that seems to reverberate with all aspects of wind turbine technology…..Just because you can….doesn’t mean you should. One bad idea in exchange for another will never make it right. Oh and ps nuclear is boring, old, reliable, base load power that actually contributes to the grid. Wind will always be flashy, expensive, destructive, sporadically producing and useless garbage. A mere transfer of wealth from the working class to the elite. The end

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s