Winds of change may be blowing for wind turbines, study suggests

The findings also contradict the NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) hypothesis, meaning those who don’t support turbines locally do not support them generally. In this case, Baxter argues the NIMBY hypothesis is not helpful for understanding why people support/oppose or feel impacted by turbines. ”Health is really front and centre,” says Baxter. “Literature suggests that how people feel about the look of turbines in the landscape, aesthetically speaking, is one of the best predictors of turbine support but that is not the case in our study.”

Ontario Wind Resistance

VIVE LA RESISTANCEPhys.org
A new study from Western University shows the winds of change may be blowing when it comes to operating large-scale turbines in rural Ontario. In “A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict,” published recently by Energy Policy, Jamie Baxter from Western’s Department of Geography and his team explore the conundrum that while a relatively strong majority of rural Ontarians actually living with turbines in their farming communities (69 per cent) support them, the level of positive feedback in the control community was surprisingly low (25 per cent).

Baxter concludes that the results from the control group signal that rural Ontario may, in the future, want to close their doors for business where turbines are concerned and that a more radical retooling may be needed for sustainable turbine policy.

The findings also contradict the NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) hypothesis…

View original post 76 more words

2 thoughts on “Winds of change may be blowing for wind turbines, study suggests”

  1. FYI Folks:
    http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2101&context=etd

    Hopefully that link works.

    This is possibly one of the worst papers I have ever read on wind power and the consequences. The nicest thing I can say about it is that it is childish in style and execution.

    How it got somebody a Masters degree is beyond me. Are the standards really this low?

    Even if I were a supporter of Wind and Solar (Which I am not) I would find this study embarrassing to me me as a mentor, theses supervisor or if I ran his department.

    This is so sad….

    I would not use this study as anything but an example of how childish the arguments promoting Green Energy can be. Is it the proponents or the Green Energy? Does it cause wilting of the IQ? I must ponder this…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s