Niagara region Wind Corp’s turbines to be largest in North America

The largest turbines in North America will soon rise over West Lincoln.

On Thursday, the provincial government announced it had approved Niagara Region Wind Corporation’s renewable energy application to operate a 77-wind turbine project in the West Lincoln area. The announcement was made the same day that Health Canada released results of its study into the impacts on human health from industrial wind turbines which concluded with the findings of Ontario’s chief medical officer of health, Dr. Arlene King, in 2010.

Health Canada’s assurances however do little to calm the fears of those living in the project’s vicinity.

“The real problem is the health issues for the people in the footprint of the project,” said Catherine Mitchell, who herself lived in the project area before moving to Welland. She is a board member with Mothers Against Wind Turbines which will hold an emergency meeting as it now has 14 days to launch an appeal.

“It’s been approved by the Ministry of Environment but not by the people impacted by this decision,” Mitchell added, noting there were 2,572 comments on the application listing concerns ranging from property values and health impacts to rising energy costs and environmental impacts. “The concerns go on and on for pages.”

Mitchell, who is most concerned with low frequency sound and has been studying it, said she was shocked and awed by the government’s approval.

West Lincoln Mayor Doug Joyner said he was also surprised to see the approval come this soon.

“We expected this to come through but we didn’t expect it until after Christmas,” said Joyner. “It’s a little sooner than expected.”

The ministry’s approval doesn’t come without stipulations however, and Joyner said the township would do what it can to ensure NRWC adheres to the rules and regulations.

As a result of comments received by the municipality and local residents a condition of the approval requires Niagara Region Wind Corporation to:

• •   not construct or operate more than seventy-seven out of the eighty wind turbine generators identified in the approval
• •   comply with the ministry’s noise emission limits at all times
• •   carry out an acoustic emission audit of the sound levels produced by the operation of the equipment at five receptors
• •   carry out an acoustic emission audit of the acoustic emissions produced by the operation of two of the wind turbine generators
• •   manage stormwater, and control sediment and erosion during and post construction
• •   develop and implement a pre- and post-construction ground water monitoring program
• •   carry out specific items if foundation dewatering or water takings by tanker exceed 50,000 L/day
• •   apply the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Operational Statement, if during construction, waterbodies that were previously not identified are discovered
• •   design, construct and operate a spill containment facility for each of the Transformer Substations
• •   implement the pre and post construction Natural Heritage monitoring program, which includes bird and bat monitoring
• •   undertake the supplementary monitoring program discussed with Environment Canada and determine next steps as part of the program including the implementation of mitigation measures in response to any potential unanticipated adverse effects
• •   ensure that activities requiring authorizations under the Endangered Species Act are not commenced until authorizations are in place
• •   create a Community Liaison Committee with members of the public and applicant
• •   undertake ongoing Aboriginal consultation and fulfill all commitments made by it
• •   prepare a Traffic Management Plan to be provided to the upper and lower tier municipalities, and
• •   notify the ministry of complaints received alleging adverse effect caused by the construction, installation, operation, use or retirement of the facility.

A representative of NRWC was not immediately available for comment. Check back for updates.

The Standard, Grimsby Lincoln News By Amanda Moore

It’s been a tough week for some fighting Ontario’s wind whimsy: part one

I co-wrote a piece with Parker Gallant that was put out by Wind Concerns Ontario on Wednesday, which received some attention before Health Canada released conclusions from a study regarding people and wind turbines the next day as Ontario’s government approved the Niagara Region Wind Corporation (NRWC)project to erect 77 of the “largest turbines in North America” in West Lincoln. I hope to cover all these things today, but I must start with the NRWC decision, because I had planned to communicate why this rose to be the worst planned wind project after the contract for Big Thunder was eliminated – which was after I’d written that it was a big mistake.

The NRWC project is poor because of the environment it occurs within. The project was offered a feed-in tariff (FIT) contract on February 24th, 2011. At that time there was speculation this was a petulant award, placing industrial wind turbines in the opposition leader’s riding shortly after suspending the possibility of turbines off the coast of the energy minister’s riding. Said that minister at the time:

“Ontario could have taken the easy route and we could have not have made these critical investments – that was the advice of, frankly, both opposition leaders here in Ontario who have demonstrated a remarkable lack of leadership, fortitude and commitment when it comes to building a clean, reliable and modern energy system,”

Let’s talk about leadership, fortitude and commitment again – as I did inwasted on the traditional territory of the Mississaugas.

The NRDC project is located to the north of a transmission line the government has avoided entering into service for many years. That line was seen critical to increased trade, and growing the ability to “deliver 8000 MW more power … from the Nagara Falls area to where it needs to be.”

I’ll try to show, with 2 maps, how the non-completed transmission project and the NRWC project relate.

The Niagara reinforcement line runs east west (it’s not connected because of a nonsense, and the nonsensical response to nonsense, outside Caledonia).

The generation project planned in conjunction with the Niagara Reinforcement line, was a tunnel to increase the output of Niagara Falls. It was announced “in-service” March 2013. I upset some people I respect when I wrote on generation not improving anywhere near the extent expected (if at all) and attributed that failure to the transmission reinforcement project not getting done.

Unfortunately, nobody did explain how I was wrong and why the tunnel wasn’t increasing output.

Here is an update on how 12-month running total generation has changed since, with a comparison to the facilities on the U.S. side of the river. (I understand that water rights are equal):

Dr Lynn says more information is needed on Health Canada study.

The Medical Officer of Health for Grey Bruce is disappointed with a Health Canada report on wind turbines.

Doctor Hazel Lynn says the study leaves a lot of questions unanswered, including how the study was conducted.

Health Canada says it found no evidence linking exposure to wind turbine noise and health effects reported by people living near the towering structures.

However, the study did find a relationship between increasing levels of wind turbine noise and residents’ annoyance related to noise, vibration and shadow flicker from the structures.

The year-long study included a detailed questionnaire to adults in more than 1,200 households in southwestern Ontario and P.E.I. living at various distances from almost 400 wind turbines.

It explored the relationship between exposure to noise and health effects reported by people living near wind turbines.

Doctor Lynn wonders if the people questioned in the study were compared to people living a further distance away, and also what Health Canada means by saying there is a link between wind turbine noise and residents annoyance.

She says it doesn’t have a definition and we don’t have a way of measuring it.

Overall, the MOH says she doesn’t know what to make of the study without more information.

The Health Canada report concludes by saying the study alone cannot provide definitive answers and more research may be needed.

Bayshore Broadcasting, Friday, November 7, 2014 by Kevin Bernard

*(the results are being reviewed and further commentary will be available)

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/noise-bruit/turbine-eoliennes/summary-resume-eng.php

Wind Concerns Ontario

It is with great sadness that we post this advisory to you.  Today the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change approved the Niagara Region Wind Corporation industrial wind turbine project for West Lincoln, Wainfleet and Haldimand.

  If you wish to view the approval notice, you can click on the link that is provided below. 

MAWT Inc is committed to challenging the approval but financial assistance is required to make that happen.  If you have not donated yet, cheques can be mailed to:  

Mothers Against Wind Turbines Inc.

Box 132

Wellandport, ON

L0R 2J0 

This from Renewable Energy Magazine.

 [Anti-wind sentiments can attract supporters near and far even though a community, province, or country favors the use of renewable sources as a whole. The silent majority of supporters must be awoken to counter the misinformation and let public officials know they favor a transition to renewable power in their community. Without a strategic plan to build support from the start, wind projects in Ontario will continue to experience the wrath of a well-connected and organized opposition network.]

Supporters of Wind just might be surprised when they realize that the “silent majority” turn out not to be in support of wind but a well educated public BECAUSE of a well-connected and organized network!!  Well done Wind Warriors!  Proof that there is indeed strength in numbers…

Ontario Wind Proposals Increasingly at Risk for Public Defeat

A 2013 study conducted by The Environics Institute found that in Ontario, 68 percent of residents held the belief that their province could make the shift from fossil fuels to renewable power. Despite this majority of those surveyed, Ontario has experienced considerable controversy over the implementation of renewable policies since the Green Energy Act of 2009, and Premier Kathleen Wynne’s pro-wind initiatives continue to generate public scorn at speaking engagements on unrelated topics.

From Ontario residents’ wider perspectives, it seems that a transition to renewable energy is ideal. However, once a wind project is proposed in residents’ own backyards, public opposition forms to bring the project to a screeching halt. Despite the political support that exists on a macro-level, careful measures must be taken locally to build the support necessary to guide the project through the approval process with ease.

Despite an extensive two-year approval process with various environmental studies conducted, opponents of a 140-turbine wind proposal by K2 Wind in Goderich, Ontario recently filed a construction stay application to halt the project in its tracks.

The injunction filed intended to allow for the completion of a Health Canada study, which seeks to understand the impact of industrial wind projects on nearby residents. Already anti-wind groups have been successful on placing a moratorium on off-shore wind until the potential for impacts on marine life are identified.

However, Divisional Courts sided with K2, noting the “serious financial consequences” the company will suffer as a result of a minor delay in construction in contrast to the “lack of harm appellants will suffer” without granting their motion. Despite K2’s narrow escape of costly delays in this case, the opponents’ efforts continue.

When the $850 million K2 project was permitted, the Environmental Review Tribunal upheld approvals finding no evidence of health hazards imposed upon residents living near turbines. However, opponents of the K2 project have joined together with opponents of a 92-turbine Armow wind farm near Kincardine, Ontario and a smaller St. Columban project to appeal the Tribunal’s findings, which the group collectively claims violates their constitutional rights due to the potential health impacts.

A decision in this appeal is expected later this month. While Ontario looks on to see what will happen to K2 and future wind proposals in the province, these cases demonstrate opponents’ abilities to band together to impact the success of a proposal at any stage of development.

Anti-wind sentiments can attract supporters near and far even though a community, province, or country favors the use of renewable sources as a whole. The silent majority of supporters must be awoken to counter the misinformation and let public officials know they favor a transition to renewable power in their community. Without a strategic plan to build support from the start, wind projects in Ontario will continue to experience the wrath of a well-connected and organized opposition network. Continue reading Winning The War of Words- Wind Warriors Voices are Being Heard →

Save Ostrander Point

Thursday, 27 November 2014 from 7:00 PM to 9:30 PM (EST)

• A new study has found that wind farms generate below 20% of their supposed output for 20 weeks a year, and generate below 10% for 9 weeks a year.

• Wind farms, on average, only exceed 90% of their rated output for 17 hours a year.

• Though the government acknowledges that wind farms produce much less energy than their sticker capacity would suggest, the report shows that even the average production (of around a quarter of capacity) is extremely misleading about the amount of power wind farms can be relied up to provide.

Wind farms are extremely volatile, with outputs fluctuating by five percentage points over short periods of time, a report based on new data by the Adam Smith Institute and Scientific Alliance has found. These findings suggest the UK’s energy infrastructure can never be reliant on them in any significant way.

Specifically, the study found that wind farms generate below 20% of their supposed output for 20 weeks a year, and generate below 10% for 9 weeks a year. Wind farms, on average, only exceed 90% of their rated output for 17 hours a year.

The paper, “Wind Power Reassessed: A review of the UK wind resource for electricity generation”, (http://www.adamsmith.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Assessment7.pdf) looks at previously unexamined wind speed data reported by anemometers located at various airfields, used as a proxy for nearby wind farms, and concludes that UK wind farms, on average, exceed 80% of their supposed output for less than one week every year.

The study also looks at the short-term (30 – 90 minute) variability of wind generation and reveals swings in output are far higher than is normal from conventional energy generation, such as from gas or nuclear plants. Swings of five percentage points of output are not uncommon, which contradicts the claim that a widespread wind fleet installation will smooth variability. There are frequent but unpredictable periods where wind energy generation fails for days on end.

The report will severely undermine the case for a move towards yet more wind generation because it suggests that wind can never be a major, reliable source of energy for the UK. It also suggests that the UK’s drive to reduce its carbon footprint through expanding wind power is misguided. Wind power is so unreliable and intermittent that it makes much more sense to look to nuclear and gas as better low emission alternatives to the status quo.

In his research, the report’s author Dr. Capell Aris looked at 6.5m individual recordings from 22 sites in the UK and 21 from Ireland and the continent.

Commenting on the report, Dr Aris said:

The current reliance on wind energy to reduce carbon dioxide emissions is inefficient and compromises energy security. Power output of the studied system is below 20% of nominal capacity for over 20 weeks of the year, and below 10% for 9 weeks.

When we study those periods when production falls below 20% of rated capacity, more than three quarters of this occurs in periods longer than 12 hours. Each winter has periods where wind generation is negligible for several days.

The situation across the whole of northern Europe is much the same, so a Europe-wide power grid would provide no extra security; the study demonstrates that interconnectors will not solve wind’s intermittency problem.

Head of Policy at the Adam Smith Institute, Ben Southwood, said:

Wind farms are a bad way of reducing emissions and a bad way of producing power. They are expensive and deeply inefficient and it seems like they reduce the value of housing enormously in nearby areas. We probably do want to reduce carbon emissions, because according to the IPCC global warming will begin to slow economic growth in one hundred years, but nuclear and gas power are our best ways of doing that until cheap and efficient energy storage options are available on a vast scale to smooth the highly variable output of renewables.

Director of the Scientific Alliance, Martin Livermore, said:

This study is a graphic illustration that wind turbines cannot provide a secure supply of electricity, no matter how large the distribution grid.

Notes to editors:

For further comments or to arrange an interview, contact Kate Andrews, Communications Manager, at kate@adamsmith.org / 07584 778207.

The Adam Smith Institute is an independent libertarian think tank based in London. It advocates classically liberal public policies to create a richer, freer world.

The Scientific Alliance was formed in 2001 to encourage politicians to make policy on the basis of scientific evidence rather than lobbying by vested interests.

Adam Smith Institute, Written by Kate Andrews | Monday, October 27th, 2014